There Are No Blocks In Advanced Martial Arts
By Jeff Brooks
The chances are good that you know a lot of martial artists who could
take their defensive ability much further. There are two misunderstandings
under which many, even most, modern martial artists act. And these two
errors undercut a lot of the hard work they are putting into their training.
In a real confrontation the consequences can be serious.
The word for defensive technique in Japanese is instructive. Although
it is often translated as “block” the word “uke”
actually means “receive” as in how we move to effectively
receive the combative energy (the attack) of the opponent.
Misunderstanding number one: “a block is a shielding action.”
In boxing the fighters do shield their face and torso from incoming attacks
by covering up with their forearms. This is partly where the misunderstanding
comes from. We have all seen boxers defend like this. However, if you
are doing barehanded fighting, with no gloves to cushion and disperse
the energy from the incoming attack, then the blunt force trauma of the
attack to the forearms will quickly – after just a few hard blows
from a strong attacker – damage them beyond use.
It is rare, in a combative situation, that shielding of that kind would
be intentionally employed. Yes it is better to get hit in the arm than
in the face if you have to make the choice. But practicing taking hits
to the forearm as your defensive strategy is like practicing crashing
your car into bushes instead of oncoming traffic. As a last ditch effort,
okay. But why not learn to use the brakes? Or in the case of defensive
fighting skills, why not learn what actually is taught in the kata?
The second misunderstanding about blocks – and the more common
one – is that blocks are interceptions. That is “blocks are
like anti-missile techniques.”
It is as if people who teach defending this way actually believe that
you can perceive the incoming technique, process the information and respond
decisively and accurately to it. You can’t. No matter how good you
are if you are reacting to the opponent’s decision making, if you
allow your opponent the initiative in the fight, however briefly, they
will quickly outpace your ability to keep responding.
The reactive reflex arch is too long. You can pull this off in choreographed
or predictable technique exchanges; and you may be able to do it where
attack zones are limited (in sport matches where no attacks are allowed
below the belt or to the back does set up a situation in which you have
a highly predictable and relatively easily defendable target region.)
Using your arms as “anti-missile” interceptors can work under
these limited conditions but it is far inferior to genuine defensive technique
as embodied in kata and taught in actual combative arts. And which is
required in self-defense action.
The first misunderstanding may come from watching sport of boxing, or
from a childhood panic reflex to duck and cover. This second one may be
a metaphoric construction derived from battlefield tactical training,
or movies about it.
On the battlefield we choose between fire and maneuver. A rifleman or
a tank – or tactical groups of these – move and shoot. Moving
and shooting are not the same. Like hearing and vision they are related
but inevitably separate dimensions of activity.
The treads on a tank give it mobility. They can position the tank to
fire but they have no special effect on the firing. The same is true for
the tank’s gun. It fires. It cannot affect the mobility of the tank.
As a rifleman (or hand gunner, etc.) you can move and fire at the same
time but the feet do the moving and the hands do the firing and these
are separate functions, however well coordinated they may be when performed
by an expert.
This does not match what we need to do in order to maximize our effectiveness
as martial artists. Our bodies are much more complex and so are more able
to function as integrated systems not just as related systems of fire
and mobility. (This attribute is most evidently true with empty hand but
it holds to a large degree when examining armed exchanges with bladed
or impact weapons.)
Certainly it is essential to gain the initiative in the interaction immediately
or at least as rapidly as possible. If we move properly in response to
incoming force it is possible to simultaneously (in a single movement)
1. Reroute the incoming energy past our target region,
2. Reposition our body just outside the range of attack,
3. Off balance the opponent,
4. Damage the opponent’s attacking personal weapon
5. Execute a counter and/or set up a counter attack
that is launched without any extra motion of your body.
To do this we have to understand the use of the full body in movement.
If we move the body as parts – an arm here, a step there –
we will not maximize our ability to move effectively. The means of moving
the body as a fully integrated system utilizes the three components of
koshi – the ability to move in a whip-like, helical form by rotating
from the center, compression – drawing the body toward the center
point and then exploding force outward, and using the arches of the body
– integrated flows of energy and body architecture which connect
the whole body in a resilient unified structure.
Describing those three components of fully integrated body movement is
outside the scope of this article. If you haven’t studied them you
should get this information because it will add a whole new level of achievement
to what you are doing.
When we move in this way we can feel that the “defensive positions”
in our kata and our combative tactics are not merely “point to point”
interceptor defenses but in effect are “zone defenses.” We
don’t know precisely where the attack is targeted against us but
we do not in fact need that precise predictive intelligence to respond
effectively. This understanding informs our use of the hand, arm and body
positions in “defensive” techniques, and makes it different
and much more Boolean than the usual “point to point” interpretation
of defensive movement.
But what this way of moving does is allow the body shift and opponent
contact to be a single motion, and allows for no perceptible delay in
following up, responding to incoming assaultive technique.
This idea is an entry point to advanced martial arts. If you go in this
direction your martial arts will be transformed and you will become a
truly effective fighter and a practitioner of a higher order.
About The Author:
Jeffrey Brooks, Seventh Degree Black Belt, US Shorin Ryu
Karate, has been the director of Northampton Karate Dojo in Northampton,
Massachusetts since 1987 and director of Northampton Zendo since 1993.
He is author of “Rhinoceros Zen – Zen Martial Arts and the
Path to Freedom.” His column Zen Mirror and other articles appear
FightingArts.com is pleased to announce its first
book: “Rhinoceros Zen –Zen
Martial Arts and the Path to Freedom,” by Jeffrey Brooks, a work
that portrays the dual paths and interplay between Zen and Karate-do.
and easy to read, it is full of insight and wisdom. It is a rewarding
read for any martial artist.
(Softcover, 300 pages, illustrated)